Nomination Evidence: dongjoon-hyun
Project: apache/spark Period: 2026-02-14 to 2026-02-21
Summary
dongjoon-hyun contributes both code (15 PRs) and reviews (68 reviews), with a strong focus on welcoming newcomers (35 first-timer PR reviews).
Highlights
- 15 commits, 68 PRs reviewed, 35 review comments | https://github.com/apache/spark/commits?author=dongjoon-hyun
- Drove PR #54355 ([SPARK-55578][SQL][TESTS] Improve
DockerJDBCIntegrationSuiteto supportsleepBeforeTesting): https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/54355 - Review on PR #54374 ([SPARK-55597][INFRA] Add initial issue templates for spark): "Yes. It should be, @gaogaotiantian . > For this specific case, do we want to k......" https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/54374
- Review comment on PR #53859 ([SPARK-55092][SQL] Disable partition grouping in
KeyGroupedPartitioningwhen not needed): "Ya, this sounds like a newcopyTagFrom-related bug to me, too. In this case, could you make a new JIRA issue (and its..." https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/53859
Contribution statistics
Code contributions (GitHub)
- PRs opened: 15
- PRs merged: 0
- Lines added: 456
- Lines deleted: 233
- Commits: 15
Code review
- PRs reviewed: 68
- Review comments given: 35
- Issue comments: 59
- APPROVED: 23 (33%)
- CHANGES_REQUESTED: 1 (1%)
- COMMENTED: 43 (63%)
Composite score
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | 0.0/10 | 0 high-complexity PRs of 1 scored |
| Stewardship | 8.3/10 | 35% maintenance work, 100% consistency |
| Review depth | 6.9/10 | 0.8 comments/review, 41% questions, 19 contributors |
| Composite | 5.1/10 | out of 66 contributors |
Review relationships
People this contributor reviews most
- peter-toth: 14 reviews
- gaogaotiantian: 11 reviews
- parthchandra: 11 reviews
- sarutak: 7 reviews
- viirya: 5 reviews
- zhengruifeng: 4 reviews
- pan3793: 3 reviews
- ueshin: 3 reviews
- Dzeri96: 2 reviews
- cloud-fan: 1 reviews
People who review this contributor's PRs most
- peter-toth: 6 reviews
- sarutak: 3 reviews
- zhengruifeng: 2 reviews
- pan3793: 1 reviews
- HyukjinKwon: 1 reviews
- Yicong-Huang: 1 reviews
- yaooqinn: 1 reviews
- huaxingao: 1 reviews
Newcomer welcoming
dongjoon-hyun reviewed 35 PRs from contributors with 3 or fewer PRs in the project, including cloud-fan, LuciferYang, pan3793, zhengruifeng, vinodkc and 5 others.
Community health profile
Relational metrics: how this contributor strengthens the community beyond code output.
- Net reviewer ratio: 4.5x
- Interaction breadth: 19 unique contributors (concentration: 21%)
- Newcomer welcoming: 35 reviews on PRs from contributors with 3 or fewer PRs
- Names: cloud-fan, LuciferYang, pan3793, zhengruifeng, vinodkc, HyukjinKwon, Dzeri96, zgzzbws, yaooqinn, manuzhang
- Helping ratio: 56% of GitHub comments directed at others' PRs
- Review depth: 0.8 comments/review, 41% questions (53 comments on 68 reviews)
- Stewardship: 35% of work is maintenance (29/83 PRs: 8 authored, 21 reviewed)
- Consistency: 100% (2/2 weeks active)
Complexity of authored work
- PRs scored: 1
- High complexity (>= 0.5): 0
- Low complexity (< 0.5): 1
- Average complexity: 0.114
Quality of review contributions
Probing review comments (expressing uncertainty, challenging assumptions): 3
Most significant probing reviews (on highest-complexity PRs)
- PR #54374 ([SPARK-55597][INFRA] Add initial issue templates for spark, score 0.497)
- Topics: micro versions
- Comment: "Yes. It should be, @gaogaotiantian . > For this specific case, do we want to k..."
- PR #54315 ([SPARK-55522][WEBUI] Allow inline scripts, event handlers and styles in Spark UI with Content-Security-Policy, score 0.477)
- Comment: "May I ask why this is removed?"
- PR #54352 ([SPARK-55490][PS][FOLLOW-UP] Fix
groupby(as_index=False).aggwith dict, score 0.427)- Comment: "This is
setinstead ofdict, isn't it, @ueshin ? I'm a little confused with ..."
- Comment: "This is
Highest-judgment review comments (on others' PRs)
(Selected by length, technical content, and presence of questions)
- PR #53859 ([SPARK-55092][SQL] Disable partition grouping in
KeyGroupedPartitioningwhen not needed)- File:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/EnsureRequirements.scala - "Ya, this sounds like a new
copyTagFrom-related bug to me, too. In this case, could you make a new JIRA issue (and its corresponding PR) for traceability , @peter-toth ? - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50862 - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34172 - https://github.com/apache/spark/pu"
- File:
- PR #53840 ([SPARK-55075][K8S] Track executor pod creation errors with ExecutorFailureTracker)
- File:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterManager.scala - "For K8s
DeploymentandStatefulSet, the following will be correct. Could you revise the message? ```scala - logInfo("Allocator does not support setExecutorPodsLifecycleManager method. " + - "Pod creation failures will not be tracked.") + logInfo("No need to track pod creation failure because a"
- File:
- PR #54374 ([SPARK-55597][INFRA] Add initial issue templates for spark)
- File:
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml - "Can we be more accurate like Apache JIRA issue system? - Since we receive the bug reports for the releases, the bug report version should be 3-digit like
4.1.1instead of4.1. - We don't usebranchname. So, please use4.2.0instead ofmaster."
- File:
- PR #53840 ([SPARK-55075][K8S] Track executor pod creation errors with ExecutorFailureTracker)
- File:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterManager.scala - "Shall we use the following style to minimize the change. For example,
KubernetesClusterManagerSuite?scala - lifecycleManager: ExecutorPodsLifecycleManager) = { + lifecycleManager: Option[ExecutorPodsLifecycleManager] = None) = {"
- File:
- PR #54374 ([SPARK-55597][INFRA] Add initial issue templates for spark)
- File:
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml - "Yes. It should be, @gaogaotiantian . > For this specific case, do we want to keep all the micro versions? For example, for 3.5, do we want to list all versions from 3.5.0 to 3.5.8? Will that be too many?"
- File:
Area focus
Files touched (authored PRs)
connector/docker-integration-tests/src(27 files)pom.xml(3 files).github/workflows/test_report.yml(2 files)resource-managers/kubernetes/core(2 files).github/workflows/benchmark.yml(1 files).github/workflows/build_and_test.yml(1 files).github/workflows/build_infra_images_cache.yml(1 files).github/workflows/build_python_connect.yml(1 files)
Areas reviewed (from PR titles)
- metrics (10 PRs)
- security (7 PRs)
- testing (5 PRs)